Re: XP and Vista

Louis126 wrote:



On another note though, I'd like to add: I'm really amazed at all of the LICENSE POLICE who hang out in this community. It really amazes me.


Because free-loading scum like you raise the prices that we honest citizens have to pay; that's why.


I think what really amazes me most about this is, why in the world you think I would give a rat's *** about any of that.

What amazes is me is that you can come to this newsgroup with that sort of attitude and then expect free advice and support. You're parents raised a fine little parasite, didn't they?


The ONLY relevant LICENSING issue here is that I have rights to use both of these instances of Microsoft Windows software.
> I acknowledge that a license does not give a person ownership. But
> it does give user rights to the one who paid for it. That is all that > matters
> here.

Those licenses are valid ONLY on the machines with which they were purchased. (If you can't get you head around licensing, you'd better look into another career; something simple like flipping burgers. No IT department is going to hire someone with your slip-shod attitude; it'd be too likely to cost the company hundreds of thousands of dollars in fines.)







--

Bruce Chambers

Help us help you:
http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html

http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx/kb/555375

They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety. ~Benjamin Franklin

Many people would rather die than think; in fact, most do. ~Bertrand Russell

The philosopher has never killed any priests, whereas the priest has killed a great many philosophers.
~ Denis Diderot
.

Loading