Re: Why this should be the Win7 newsgroup
- From: "Electro Lytes" <electro@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 16 Nov 2009 09:01:31 -0800
"+Bob+" <nomailplease@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message news:nje1g5hi4h3tuph97a7c3i2tljrium7oqo@xxxxxxxxxx
On Sun, 15 Nov 2009 16:56:04 -0800, Frank <fb@xxxxxxx> wrote:
igotsaurus wrote:Having steadily used Win 7 since the first public I entirely sympathize
with those who label it Vista SP3.
Then try and purchase Vista SP3. You can't as of yet and when you can,
you'll still have Vista, not Windows 7.
But Windows 7 should have been SP3. That fact is irrefutable. Vista is
broken, and even MS admits it publicly in their commercials.
Windows 7 should be called Windows 7 because Microsoft said so. That fact is irrefutable. Windows 7 is NOT Vista Sp3. Bob, you are an idiot plain and simple. I suggest getting with Alias and he can help you migrate to Ubuntu. You're too stupid to use Windows products.
.
- References:
- Why this should be the Win7 newsgroup
- From: igotsaurus
- Re: Why this should be the Win7 newsgroup
- From: Frank
- Why this should be the Win7 newsgroup
- Prev by Date: black screen with mouse pointer only
- Next by Date: Re: Why this should be the Win7 newsgroup
- Previous by thread: Re: Why this should be the Win7 newsgroup
- Next by thread: Re: Why this should be the Win7 newsgroup
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
