Re: Only 16 More Days to Go

"Charlie Tame" <charlie@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message news:OB6YdIFuJHA.5376@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx


The poster formerly known as 'The Poster Formerly Known as Nina DiBoy' wrote:
Mike Hall - MVP wrote:
Lots want to be spoon fed. Computer users are like car owners. Most don't care about the inner workings. They just want it to start and do what they expect it to do or have been told that it will do.

Which is why it doesn't matter what's under the hood so to speak. If an organization decided to build a linux system to spoon feed the untechnical masses and did it well, it is quite possible that linux could do this job better than windows does.


The reason I singled out home finance was because the developers of the open source variants openly admitted that the programs on offer did not have all of the facilities of the Windows variants. The developers would seem to be more truthful than some avid fans of Linux. It would do better if software was on show as it has been for Windows. I know that boxed software is a little passé these days, but somebody looking at computers in a store will also wander down the software aisles too, and there is nothing obviously Linux amongst it all.

This is true, but considering most linux software is free, it would be awfully silly for those individuals/organizations that develop the free software to spend money putting a CD in a pretty box and shrink wrap, no?


The Windows OEMs also include MS Works in their packages which, while not being as advanced as OO3, admirably panders to those who want 'simple to use', and gets over the huge cost and complexity of MS Office. Only people building their own systems do not get the benefit of 'Works et al'.

Works...ugh! Again this is just my opinion and experience speaking, but Works is horrible! OOo files are so much easier to open than Works files, too! Yet I have to admit that when Joe Blow goes out and purchases a computer, if Works is the office suite that's installed, they will usually use it because it's already there.


And then, of course, there is the mighty Mac which is a nicely polished and very stylish alternative to a Windows PC. Even though more expensive, the Mac has made more ground re new sales than Linux. A good proportion of software sold in stores will also run on Macs. It says so on the boxes. One sees 'Mac compatible' on the sides of new hardware boxes, printers, scanners, webcams etc too.

I have my own reasons to dislike Macs, but what you say about them is true.


There are no free lunches. Software like OO owes much to personnel within empires like IBM and Sun. Programs suitable for family computers are not in the picture for companies like these, and solo programmers typing away beyond the witching hour are not capable of producing polished stuff suitable for attaching a price tag in a store.

Maybe Alias can learn to program and surprise us all.. :-)


Whether OOo was designed for home machines or not, in my experience, it seems to fit better than Office 2007 so far.



Hehe, you are both right of course, but as I mentioned in another thread (Lost it - oh well) there is a market shift toward mobile devices. Sure, it's a "Yuppy" thing and won't become a "General Usage" thing, but many in business are being pushed toward LapTop computing even in their office - so that they can take work home with them.

Many have resisted Vista because their IT people are unsure about it. OEMs all advertise "Downgrade to XP" as an option. So as I see it the market is mostly frozen where mainstream operating systems are concerned. The financial mess is not helping anybody either.

Obviously MS are aware of this, and are pushing ahead with W7, but to be honest if I were an IT pro considering purchasing for a corporation then I'd feel obliged to at least see if there were cheaper alternatives.

Laptops are (IMNSHO) are a security risk, a recently terminated employee raised this issue right here so to speak... OMG she still has her Laptop. First thought was the cost of the machine which was brand new, seems like only me and the IT guy saw what the real cost of that could amount to. If you are going the way of people taking home work the way to do it is NOT to have the data on their Laptop. Since this implies a server based methodology the OS at either end does not matter at all. What matters is the software you want it to run.

At this time the bells and whistles that come with Vista are not necessary for many people. Sure, I find Vista 64 is now stable, reliable, and faster then it was to begin with, however for the business we are in it really does not offer much more than XP or Linux. Seems to me that the advantage MS has is really being diminished by XP more than anything else, so MS faces the task of persuading business to switch by changing the way businesses think about computing. I'm not sure that an OS with everything in it already is the answer, it may be a bare bones system with modular structure.


The one good thing about the super slim Win 7 is that it does not require Supercomputer resources to run, but companies will still face the problem of critical processes not being compatible. If it didn't work with Vista, it most likely will not work with Win 7 either.

This is the reasoning used for staying with Win 2000. It still runs on old stuff and it works. If the entire industry worked together instead of fighting each other, life would be so much easier for all of us. Vista has actually matured into a good solid OS, but still suffers from the initial bad publicity and intransigence on the part of the rest of the industry at the time.

I have been running Vista 64 with no problems other than it will no longer co-operate with my Canon scanner. Vuescan would get it working again, but at a price where I may as well get a cheap scanner which is Vista 64 compatible. The problem here is not Vista or the scanner. It is me being a cheapskate.. :-)

--

Mike Hall - MVP Windows Experience
http://msmvps.com/blogs/mikehall/

.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Why Ubuntu (Still) Sucks - Part 2: Compiz Fusion
    ... In the first part of the video, the unseen demonstrator shows-off Windows Vista Aero, including some of the more talked-about UI effects. ... they show Ubuntu with Compiz Fusion enabled. ... Of course, like most attempts by the Linux community to parrot Windows Vista, the aforementioned "eye candy showdown" misses the forest for the trees. ...
    (microsoft.public.windows.vista.general)
  • Re: Demand That Microsoft Sell No Code Before Its Time
    ... > would find that linux vulnerabilities are on the up. ... >> Gate$ a chance to fix a lame product with patch after patch after ... >> patch as they continue to struggle to keep their computers working. ... Windows is less secure just because it is installed on 95% of all PCs. ...
    (microsoft.public.windowsxp.general)
  • Re: Why Ubuntu (Still) Sucks - Part 2: Compiz Fusion
    ... In the first part of the video, the unseen demonstrator shows-off Windows Vista Aero, including some of the more talked-about UI effects. ... they show Ubuntu with Compiz Fusion enabled. ... Of course, like most attempts by the Linux community to parrot Windows Vista, the aforementioned "eye candy showdown" misses the forest for the trees. ...
    (microsoft.public.windows.vista.general)
  • Re: Browser security under Linux
    ... Explorer 7 on Windows Vista has a distinct advantage in protecting ... And no browser on Linux can write to any file / directory for which the user ... Vista provides compile- and run-time protection ...
    (comp.os.linux.misc)
  • Make the Most of Your New PC
    ... mint Windows Vista computer this holiday ... the Workgroup name is exactly the same for all the computers in the ... that doesn't support USB 2.0) and low-capacity portable hard drives. ...
    (microsoft.public.windows.vista.general)