Re: Vista and Ubuntu?
- From: Charlie Tame <charlie@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 25 Feb 2009 18:40:10 -0600
webster72n wrote:
"Peter Dickason" <n_o_s_p_a_mGuruPeter@xxxxxxx> wrote in message news:e3j%235qflJHA.3888@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxHow are you running VirtualPC on home edition? When I tried it, it complained. Said I needed professional or something to that accord?
Didn't run it yet, although it is ready for use, without 'professional assistance' or something.
All I would have to do is, insert the Ubuntu disk for installation.
But I want to be aware of any traps, if existing.
The only thing I remember from the installation of Virtual PC is, that it supposedly isn't compatible with WinVista and which can safely be ignored.
Pete
I am running Vista 64 bit and tried MS Virtual PC 2007. It will NOT run Ubuntu or Debian because the video refuses to work.
What DOES work very very well is using Ubuntu or Debian as the installed OS with Sun Microsystems' VirtualBOX, but you lose some Vista 'Eye Candy"... however it seems to run faster than Vista installed as the OS.
It won't hurt to try but if it keeps falling on it's backside it may be more trouble than it's worth...
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Vista and Ubuntu?
- From: webster72n
- Re: Vista and Ubuntu?
- References:
- Vista and Ubuntu?
- From: webster72n
- Re: Vista and Ubuntu?
- From: Peter Dickason
- Re: Vista and Ubuntu?
- From: webster72n
- Vista and Ubuntu?
- Prev by Date: Re: I just read this
- Next by Date: Re: alias, the sheep-fukkin lying linux troll just made bail...!
- Previous by thread: Re: Vista and Ubuntu?
- Next by thread: Re: Vista and Ubuntu?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|