Re: Why is Vista 30 times slower than XP in File Transfering?
- From: weewillie@xxxxxxxx
- Date: Tue, 30 Dec 2008 16:19:29 +0000
On Tue, 30 Dec 2008 11:05:43 -0500, Jack the Ripper <Jack@xxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
xfile wrote:
Assuming everyone is telling the truth, it implies the OS is unstable and
inconsistent which is the worst case scenario for a software product because
no one really knows where are the problems may reside needless to say how to
solve it.
"Jack the Ripper" <Jack@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:ugl6f9jaJHA.1532@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
weewillie@xxxxxxxx wrote:
Earlier today I transfered c 150 files, 1.5gb from Vista to a usb2I just copied 1.88gbs folder 133 files in the folder from the HD on my
drive and it took an hour
When I then transfered those same files from the usb stick to xp it
took 2 mins
Why is Vista so incredibly slow at file transfers?
using 2gb mem and 2 ghz on vista business laptop
and 1 gb mem 1 ghz on xp
laptop to a USB HD, and it took all of about 1.5 minutes, maybe less with
Vista Ultimate.
Then I took the same folder and copied it to my USB 4gb stick, and it took
about the same amount of time to copy when I copied the folder to my USB
HD.
2gb ram and 1.73 ghz
I would have to disagree. The base code for the O/S should be the same
for all versions of the Vista NT based O/S. It was that way for NT 4.0,
and Win 2k workstation and server O/S(s). It was the same for XP Home
and Pro. That is the based code was the same.
I don't know what the guy's problem is about. But I think if I had Vista
Business on this notebook, I wouldn't have any problems with file copy.
Maybe, the guy has not applied any updates or the SP to Vista. Who
knows, as he really has not given any details.
I said in my original post, I'm using vista business sp1, with 2gb
memory and 2 ghz processor
What I didn't originally say but now add, the recipient xp m/c had a
3.6ghz processor with 1 gb of memory
The files being transferred were in 10 seperate directories
.
- References:
- Why is Vista 30 times slower than XP in File Transfering?
- From: weewillie
- Re: Why is Vista 30 times slower than XP in File Transfering?
- From: Jack the Ripper
- Re: Why is Vista 30 times slower than XP in File Transfering?
- From: xfile
- Re: Why is Vista 30 times slower than XP in File Transfering?
- From: Jack the Ripper
- Why is Vista 30 times slower than XP in File Transfering?
- Prev by Date: Re: Why is Vista 30 times slower than XP in File Transfering?
- Next by Date: Re: Da Lamb Chop
- Previous by thread: Re: Why is Vista 30 times slower than XP in File Transfering?
- Next by thread: Windows Vista
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
Loading