Re: vista releiability

Tech-Archive recommends: Fix windows errors by optimizing your registry

"Mick Murphy" <MickMurphy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message news:5D22FF4F-C6A2-4070-BD93-678502142F0A@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
You LIVE in a hole in the ground, lol.
Crawl back under your rock.
--
Mad Mike


"D. Eth" wrote:

"flybywire" <ramrod@xxxxxx> wrote in message
news:_m4Nk.127426$0t2.60440@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> my system stability chart shows it at 9.7 at start beginning this year > and
> 5.15 today
>
> shall run the other reports
>
> glad to see you are a bunch with a sense of humour
>
>
> "Mick Murphy" <MickMurphy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
> news:5665823A-AD38-45F4-AE79-D06131F904AB@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> The Maximum is: 5.9
>>
>> -- >> Mad Mike
>>
>>
>> "flybywire" wrote:
>>
>>> When i first got my laptop with vista my rating was 9.17 now i only
>>> average
>>> around 4.15
>>>
>>> Anybody got any comparison indices
>>>
>>> am using asus x51rl , 1024 mem 120gb hd duo t2330 cpu
>>>
>>> cheers
>>>
>>> Mike
>>>
>>>
>


Sorry.
We misinterpreted what you were saying.
The reliability monitor would be a 10.
Mine is 9.43.
Any software you install, any issues could drive that number down.
The chart will give you great insight.

That Mick Murphy wouldn't know his ask from a hole in the ground.

--
Ens causa sui
Fit caedes omnibus locis




Fudging top-posting idget.
How hard is it to post in the way people write...progressive time increments ?
You friggen answer the q before it was asked.
Usenet should ban all such dipsheets !
as, all top posters are dipsheets.
Fudging non-communicative basturds

--
Ens causa sui
Fit caedes omnibus locis

.

Quantcast