Re: What Ringmaster should do

On Thu, 25 Sep 2008 13:57:36 -0700, "Ringmaster's Psychiatrist"
<ringmaster@xxxxxxxx> wrote:


"Ringmaster" <bigtop@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:ultnd4hgc8h7fj6obn7hb7pcvos3jl2qvj@xxxxxxxxxx
On Thu, 25 Sep 2008 13:21:08 -0700, "Bill M. Yanaire"
<billm@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:


"Ringmaster" <bigtop@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:1nqnd41oqp5bgahhc7k676acmnttl095r1@xxxxxxxxxx
On Thu, 25 Sep 2008 12:24:44 -0700, Frank <aliasis@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:

Ringmaster, Frank's Ass Licker wrote:


What's really fucked-up is you and Frank. Two assholes who only can
have *** pour out of their mouths and blindly worship Microsoft and
attempt to defend them no matter what.

Wrong ***-munch! We have, like most all of the millions using Vista
have, a good, properly installed and functioning copy of Vista.
You don't!

How in the hell do you know what I have? You only know what I tell you
and I never told you my install doesn't work you always lying sack of
wet ***. As I've said countless times I DOCUMENT what's wrong in
Vista. You being nothing but a ass kissing, boot licking Microsoft
apologist can't stand to have the truth come out that Vista is fatally
flawed. Slow file copying is just one of many known and Microsoft
confirmed issues. Still you lie your *** encrusted ass off about it
and try to blame end users. That makes you a belly crawling little
worm that can't stand the truth and needs to lie and engage in endless
personal attacks. Well dummy, how to you like being on the receiving
end?

You don't need to say exactly how you installed your system because of the
problems you have, you could have only screwed a few ways. One: Update
over an already screwed up XP.

XP was working perfectly.

Strike One.


That was your first mistake. Updating. You should have done a clean
install. Most people know that to have a "pristine" copy without
contamination, it is best to do a clean install. Since you failed to do
that you suffer the consequences.

You're living in the PAST. You dummy, you just proved you didn't read
a word of what I said using Microsoft as the source. The Vista DVD
unlike prior versions of Windows contains a IMAGE FILE of the
operating system to be installed. It doesn't matter if you do some
so-called "clean" install or a install in place the SAME, (get it
dummy?) image is written to your hard drive totally overwriting what
was there previously. Before, when you're doing a install in place
Vista COPIES your old XP settings from the Registry PLUS you
applications and moves them to a file set up for the purpose of just
holding them, THEN once the Image of Vista is decompressed all the
Vista folders in place, then and only then are the settings written
back to the new Registry.

Of course if you want to say Microsoft doesn't know what they're
doing, their design is flawed, their software buggy, be my guess. That
would be a first. Some fuckwit fanboy saying Microsoft doesn't know
what it's doing. Go for it fool.

Since you blew it on step one, it doesn't matter about step two. Your
system was already doomed from the start. Even an updated antivirus is
worthless with a screwed up system.

You blew it, because you being a damn fool, didn't read what I
actually said citing Microsoft as the source. Your further show your
ignorance by trying to link the presence of some antivirus updated or
not to the install process. Apples and oranges. The presence or
absence of ANY antivirus during the install of the OS is meaningless.

You keep grasping at straws trying to pretend you know more than I do
and you keep falling on your face.



Three: Load old programs and infected data back on to your
screwed up system.

Nope, Strike Three. You're out Billy no nothing.

OK - Maybe your data was OK but since your system was already doomed then
this is a moot point.

Your comments are worthless. Thanks for playing.

The REASON I always defeat every clueless dumbass fanboy is with my
history of being an auditor for years I'm a stickler for reading and
exactly following DETAILS and I read instructions totally and fully.
You obviously don't, just making lame assumptions. A superior mind
always trumps someone like you that refuses to listen and brings
preconceived notions to the table.

I wouldn't have done an install in place and risk my data unless the
method was indorsed by, approved and written by Microsoft. Get it yet
fool? I guess not. That's why I always make mincemeat out of you.

Of course. Because you NEVER can bring yourself to admit Vista itself
is flawed. Odd, even Microsoft admits it which is why they are racing
to finish Windows 7. Vista is dead in the water nobody wants to
upgrade to it. The vast majority of "sales" are due to preinstalling
it in big name boxes that automatically come with Vista preinstalled.


Yes there are issues with Vista.

Then tell it to Frank, that fucking freak. You can't wait to kiss his
dumb ass and support all the crap he keep spewing.

You seem to have more problems than most.

More bull***. Just because I comment on issues doesn't mean I have
them all myself or the ones I see like slow file copying in any way
interferes with my use of my computer. I'm simply pointing out how
fucked-up Vista is. Regardless, your dumbass position shared by Frank
and Yanaire and all other half-ass fools that post here is you make
groundless assumptions and then lie about what the poster actually
said.

Funny, there are millions of users who don't have problems with
Vista.

Funny, Google shows millions HAVING problems.

On my system, I run Office, Visual Studio, SQL Server all without a
hitch. Why? Because I installed my system from scratch, following the
correct instructions. Not like you who doesn't know what to do.

Big deal. You run 3 programs. Was I suppose to be impressed? Whoopie
dee do. I run HUNDREDS of different applications. Which is one reason
I didn't do a clean install. Would take days. I didn't do a clean
install for XP and it ran flawlessly.

List the "rules" I didn't follow. Go ahead, this ought to be good.


Already mentioned it in step one.

You obsessed with doing a clean install which Microsoft does NOT
mandate. Maybe you should be arguing with them. You're telling me
Microsoft has it wrong and their ENDORSED method of installing in
place, fully described on their web site and mentioned in the paper
work that comes with the Vista DVD is flawed.

Come on and say it directly then. Let's hear it.

You fucked up big time.

By following Microsoft's instructions to the letter? That is in effect
what you're suggesting.

What zooms over your head is you get confused with known issues
Microsoft ADMITS are part of Vista. One such problem is slow file
copying. Microsoft has ADMITTED this is a issue. They attempted to
correct it in SP1, did partially, but not completely. Tens of
thousands of people have reported this including people taking a brand
new already built PC out of the box and those doing clean installs.
Yet you try to climb up on a stack of bible as tell me I fucked up
doing an install in place and this is why file copying is slow.

You're simply don't get it.


I am sure there
are other problems that you are embarrassed to mention so we just won't go
there.

Sure right. Try to pump up your already bloated ego.

.