Re: Vista is the BEST OS
- From: Alias <iamalias@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 08 Aug 2008 14:41:11 +0200
Hobbes wrote:
Alias wrote:CreepinJesus wrote:I better point out to the person who said Vista is slower than XP on
comparable hardware that every version of Windows has been slower than
it's predecessor on comparable hardware. It's called progress. Computers get faster and more powerful, so the OS can do more things.
With Windows, they gotta account for the bloat. With Ubuntu, I am running the latest version of Ubuntu on an AMD AthlonXP 2200+ with an old nVidia 6200 256 MB with one gig of PC-2100 (266MHz) RAM and it is smooth, rock solid and very quick. That's called progress. Windows is called "bloat".
Alias
Most people have sound cards ... bricked by ubuntu.
I have an on board sound card that works just fine. On another computer I have a Genius sound card that works just fine. Nothing from Creative will work but who cares?
Who cares what Video Card you have ... its useless in ubuntu.
It works fine and is very *useful* for me while using Ubuntu.
"Ubuntu...when you want less from your PC"
Vista: if you want to buy a new, more expensive PC when you could use Ubuntu on your old one.
Alias
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Vista is the BEST OS
- From: Hobbes
- Re: Vista is the BEST OS
- From: Flight
- Re: Vista is the BEST OS
- References:
- Re: Vista is the BEST OS
- From: CreepinJesus
- Re: Vista is the BEST OS
- From: Alias
- Re: Vista is the BEST OS
- From: Hobbes
- Re: Vista is the BEST OS
- Prev by Date: Re: what's the difference between 'account NAMED administror' and a account with admin privilegious?
- Next by Date: Re: Change Name Of Users Folder In C Drive - Is This Possible?
- Previous by thread: Re: Vista is the BEST OS
- Next by thread: Re: Vista is the BEST OS
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
