Re: Why would a Home User buy more than Vista Basic?
- From: fb <fab@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 11 Jul 2008 18:14:32 -0700
Alias wrote:
On Fri, 11 Jul 2008 09:34:37 -0700, fb wrote:
cheley_bonstell88@xxxxxxxx wrote:
On Jul 10, 11:29 am, -*Alias** <aka@masked&anonymous.ar> wrote:
TBerk wrote:
If you're not in an office but rather at home (on the Internet) would
there be a reason to spend more for 'Vista Ultimate'?
TBerk
Why would anyone buy Vista *anything* when Ubuntu is available for free
and is a far superior operating system. Check it out atwww.ubuntu.com
Alias
My Thoughts Precisely
I started using Ubuntu about two months ago, and now use it almost
exclusively ;
- even though I have XP on the other partition
So why are you here? The sign on the door says "Vista", not ubuntu or
XP.
The sign on the door says "vista.general" but I guess you're too retarded to understand what the word "general" means.
Alias
It seems you're the retarded one.
"Vista general" does not mean neither implicitly or explicitly, that this ng is about linux or macs.
It is about Vista.
You're not really all that bright are you sheep-fukker!
.
- Follow-Ups:
- References:
- Why would a Home User buy more than Vista Basic?
- From: TBerk
- Re: Why would a Home User buy more than Vista Basic?
- From: -*Alias**
- Re: Why would a Home User buy more than Vista Basic?
- From: cheley_bonstell88
- Re: Why would a Home User buy more than Vista Basic?
- From: fb
- Re: Why would a Home User buy more than Vista Basic?
- From: Alias
- Why would a Home User buy more than Vista Basic?
- Prev by Date: Re: Why would a Home User buy more than Vista Basic?
- Next by Date: Re: Longhorn "startup sound"
- Previous by thread: Re: Why would a Home User buy more than Vista Basic?
- Next by thread: Re: Why would a Home User buy more than Vista Basic?
- Index(es):