Re: Changing default partition for storage of data in vista

Tech-Archive recommends: Repair Windows Errors & Optimize Windows Performance

The main drive to have a separate data partition (I have done so since 1992) is that when (not IF) you have to either redo or return to a previous image of the operating system partition you do not lose your data.

I have files I created in 1992. These files have survived many dozens of system redo's and returning to a previous state through the use of an imaging program. They have also survived upgrades, both physical and operating system, 6-8 times.

Also, if you dual boot (many do so) you can access the data from any operating system you have on the computer "without" touching data in another system partition.

I keep my data partition on a separate hard drive. I also have another separate hard drive for my system image files.

I create an image every Friday evening as a standard. If something goes wrong with the O/S it takes me only 10-15 minutes to get back to precisely where I was the previous Friday.

I also create a system image prior to installing any new software, in case the software ends up not to my liking. If I decide the new software is a keeper (new anti virus program for instance) I create yet another system image, over writing the one I created just prior to installing the new anti virus program.

There are just so many good reasons to have multiple partitions and drives that I have to think that those who rail against the practice are either too lazy to set their computer up in this fashion or the intricacies of doing so are beyond their competence level.

Every computer I work on for my few customers are delivered back to them with multiple partitions and I have moved all their data to a separate partition. I explain to the customer what I did and why I did it. They are all happy with the results.

--

Richard Urban
Microsoft MVP
Windows Desktop Experience


"playIT@home" <playIThome@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message news:9BDA5EC8-45F6-42D7-8107-2CCE93EECB5C@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
I hate to dig up and old topic but I just got a new machine with Vista and
want to create a data partition for all users so that when 7 arrives I can
upgrade. I have heard and read that it is a good idea to separate the OS
from user data file as that facilitates easier user backups and OS
repair/install/upgrades.

So, what is in the "D" partition whose folders are hidden on my new computer
and should I leave it alone in favor of creating a new partition for user
data?

Thanks for taking my question.

"Ken Blake, MVP" wrote:

On Mon, 20 Jul 2009 10:41:23 +0530, dgee <dgee.3vlx7c@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:


> What I want to know is how to set up the system so that data from all
> programs (e.g. Word documents, pdfs, excel files, photographs etc.) > goes
> to partition (drive) D? There must be some mechanism for that. My > home
> desktop computer which I am away from at the moment was built in 2003
> (obviously in XP days) to contain two drives - a C drive for programs
> (40gb) and a separate D drive for data (120gb). I was advised to have
> it constructed like this in order to separate my large number of large
> photo files from the programs.


I will give you the opposite advice. For most people I think that's a
poor idea. There can sometimes be good reasons for doing that (see
below), but if you are doing it with the thought that it safeguards
your data, you are almost certainly making a very serious mistake.
Doing that suggests that you do not do any backups, and it leaves you
susceptible to simultaneous loss of the original and backup to many of
the most common dangers: hard drive crashes, severe power glitches,
nearby lightning strikes, virus attacks, even theft of the computer.

If your data is important to you, you need to protect it against all
dangers by backup to external media. Separating it in a partition by
itself is not real protection at all.

I think the best reason for separating your data in a separate
partition from the system is that your backup policy is to backup only
data, and not create clones of the entire drive. If you backup your
data only, then the backup is facilitated by being able to backup the
entire data partition.

--
Ken Blake, Microsoft MVP - Windows Desktop Experience
Please Reply to the Newsgroup


.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: XP System Backup. ASR No floppy drive
    ... My own choice would be to install a fresh copy of Windows and then run restore using that. ... hoping to use System Tool Backup to create ASR. ... but says Invalid or damaged bootable partition when I ... The KB actually discusses which USB CD drives that the XP ...
    (microsoft.public.windowsxp.setup_deployment)
  • Backup strategy
    ... > I have a Windows2000 Pro desktop, and I created a backup job to daily ... Partition one of the drives into 4 partitions. ... in your mirror hard disk as your only hard disk to make sure that it boots ...
    (microsoft.public.win2000.general)
  • Re: RAID, SCHMAID.......
    ... And risky to change it later without a full image backup. ... with & in the system images so I know exactly what's where & done when. ... Pity that just saving the OS partition wont do that, ... to what raid or 10K+ drives or other new drives bring to the table. ...
    (comp.sys.ibm.pc.hardware.storage)
  • Re: another Time Machine thread - still need SuperDuper?
    ... I was thinking of making the partition the same size as the Mac's boot ... experience with Time Machine, and someone who has a similar usage ... Machine backup looks like a complete copy of your data, ... I have two identical hard drives which I'll be using ...
    (uk.comp.sys.mac)
  • Re: Restoring an image after repartitioning the image restore drive?
    ... Now suppose I increase the size of the partition on the backup drive ... But now if decide to restore a much earlier image (where the partition ... partition sizes of all drives, and as far as windows is concerned, the ...
    (microsoft.public.windowsxp.general)