Re: string & on a DLL boundary
- From: David Wilkinson <no-reply@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 29 Mar 2007 06:18:32 -0500
Andrew Chalk wrote:
Thanks!
I've a feeling a lot of people make this mistake exactly once. -:)
Andrew:
If you like to use static linking, as I do, another approach is to dedign your DLL interfaces so that they never require creating memeory in one module and freeing it in another.
If this is part of your design methodology it is not so hard, but to retrofit it to an exisong application may not be so easy.
David Wilkinson
.
- References:
- string & on a DLL boundary
- From: Andrew Chalk
- Re: string & on a DLL boundary
- From: David Lowndes
- Re: string & on a DLL boundary
- From: Andrew Chalk
- string & on a DLL boundary
- Prev by Date: Re: string & on a DLL boundary
- Next by Date: Re: string & on a DLL boundary
- Previous by thread: Re: string & on a DLL boundary
- Next by thread: Re: string & on a DLL boundary
- Index(es):
Loading