Re: Performance problem with _SECURE_SCL=0
- From: David Lowndes <DavidL@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 12 Mar 2007 21:00:26 +0000
Here is the entire code:
Thanks Ayal.
I don't see any significant difference whether _SECURE_SCL=1 or 0 in a
release build. Is there some other setting that may be relevant?
I've pasted your code into a default VS2005 SP1 console application
with _SECURE_SCL added to the preprocessor setting.
Dave
.
- References:
- Performance problem with _SECURE_SCL=0
- From: Ayal
- Re: Performance problem with _SECURE_SCL=0
- From: David Lowndes
- Performance problem with _SECURE_SCL=0
- Prev by Date: Re: no copy constructor error...
- Next by Date: Re: Performance problem with _SECURE_SCL=0
- Previous by thread: Re: Performance problem with _SECURE_SCL=0
- Next by thread: Re: Performance problem with _SECURE_SCL=0
- Index(es):
Loading