Re: Is there analog of std::mem_fun_t, but for data members?
- From: "Alex Blekhman" <tkfx.N05P4M@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 18 Apr 2006 13:56:06 +0300
Bronek Kozicki wrote:
Alex Blekhman wrote:
Thanks. However, boost is not an option for now. I hope
next version developmnet will incorporate boost.
boost license is liberal enough so that you may simply
copy necessary sources, retain copyright and use it in
your product. You do not have to install it, you may
simply take what you need and add to your own sources.
You do not even need to retain header names or structure,
just keep (C).
It could be an option if boost would have been more modular.
After several attempts to incorporate parts of boost code I
found that amount of work required is higher than
re-implementing it from scratch.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Is there analog of std::mem_fun_t, but for data members?
- From: Bronek Kozicki
- Re: Is there analog of std::mem_fun_t, but for data members?
- From: Tom Widmer [VC++ MVP]
- Re: Is there analog of std::mem_fun_t, but for data members?
- References:
- Is there analog of std::mem_fun_t, but for data members?
- From: Alex Blekhman
- Re: Is there analog of std::mem_fun_t, but for data members?
- From: Tom Widmer [VC++ MVP]
- Re: Is there analog of std::mem_fun_t, but for data members?
- From: Alex Blekhman
- Re: Is there analog of std::mem_fun_t, but for data members?
- From: Bronek Kozicki
- Is there analog of std::mem_fun_t, but for data members?
- Prev by Date: Re: Release-mode only falure when comparing STL list::iterator-s
- Next by Date: Re: Is there analog of std::mem_fun_t, but for data members?
- Previous by thread: Re: Is there analog of std::mem_fun_t, but for data members?
- Next by thread: Re: Is there analog of std::mem_fun_t, but for data members?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
