Re: Is there analog of std::mem_fun_t, but for data members?
- From: "Alex Blekhman" <tkfx.N05P4M@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 4 Apr 2006 21:06:56 +0300
Tom Widmer [VC++ MVP] wrote:
Thanks. However, boost is not an option for now. I hope
next version developmnet will incorporate boost.
With luck, VC9 will incorporate std::tr1 - Dinkumware are
certainly working on an implementation.
I'll need even more luck not to retire until then. :)
.
- References:
- Is there analog of std::mem_fun_t, but for data members?
- From: Alex Blekhman
- Re: Is there analog of std::mem_fun_t, but for data members?
- From: Tom Widmer [VC++ MVP]
- Re: Is there analog of std::mem_fun_t, but for data members?
- From: Alex Blekhman
- Re: Is there analog of std::mem_fun_t, but for data members?
- From: Tom Widmer [VC++ MVP]
- Is there analog of std::mem_fun_t, but for data members?
- Prev by Date: Re: interface programming
- Next by Date: Very dangerous pointer conversion allowed in VS 2005 std::auto_ptr
- Previous by thread: Re: Is there analog of std::mem_fun_t, but for data members?
- Next by thread: Re: Is there analog of std::mem_fun_t, but for data members?
- Index(es):
