Re: <map> erase

From: "aa" <ss>
Date: Thu, 6 Oct 2005 12:09:13 -0500

"Stephen Howe" <sjhoweATdialDOTpipexDOTcom> wrote in message
news:%23YpNagVyFHA.664@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> Hmm, wait, I don't understand how that is proper. In ++x, the iterator
>> is incremented before being passed to erase. In x++, the iterator is
>> incremented after being passed to erase...
>
> The increments are not supposed to occur after the function call.

Is this documented somewhere?

.

Follow-Ups:
- Re: <map> erase
  - From: Igor Tandetnik

References:
- <map> erase
  - From: Ian Semmel
- Re: <map> erase
  - From: Stephen Howe
- Re: <map> erase
  - From: Jason Winnebeck
- Re: <map> erase
  - From: Stephen Howe

Prev by Date: Re: <map> erase
Next by Date: Re: <map> erase
Previous by thread: Re: <map> erase
Next by thread: Re: <map> erase
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread