Re: behaviour of vector<T>::operator[]
- From: Sean Connery <SeanConnery@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 6 Sep 2005 17:07:12 -0700
"P.J. Plauger" wrote:
> "Sean Connery" <SeanConnery@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
> news:4F8510D9-50AE-4653-A3DD-828594CA297C@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
> > Is there a way to get vector<T>::operator[] to behave like .at() in debug
> > mode and [] otherwise? It would be really useful for debugging...
>
> It does that in Whidbey.
>
Gah... Thanks I think...
.
- References:
- behaviour of vector<T>::operator[]
- From: Sean Connery
- Re: behaviour of vector<T>::operator[]
- From: P.J. Plauger
- behaviour of vector<T>::operator[]
- Prev by Date: Re: behaviour of vector<T>::operator[]
- Next by Date: Re: behaviour of vector<T>::operator[]
- Previous by thread: Re: behaviour of vector<T>::operator[]
- Next by thread: Re: behaviour of vector<T>::operator[]
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
Loading