Re: Microsoft & GNU c++ compiler
From: red floyd (no.spam_at_here.dude)
Date: 07/09/04
- Next message: Antonio: "Re: How to check from destructor whether it was called due to exception or normal exit from the scope?"
- Previous message: George M. Garner Jr.: "Re: how to change unsigned short to hex code??"
- In reply to: Jason Winnebeck: "Re: Microsoft & GNU c++ compiler"
- Next in thread: Andre Kaufmann: "Re: Microsoft & GNU c++ compiler"
- Reply: Andre Kaufmann: "Re: Microsoft & GNU c++ compiler"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Fri, 09 Jul 2004 09:39:21 -0700
Jason Winnebeck wrote:
> Could one not use pragmas to turn on extensions in your "master" (PCH)
> header file when you include the SDK stuff, then turn them back on
> afterwards?
>
> Jason
>
> red floyd wrote:
>
>> Bronek Kozicki wrote:
>> (pity you must use extensions in order to compile Platform
>>
>>> SDK headers)
>>
>>
>>
>> Yeah that would be a nice thing to add either in VS2K5 or in
>> VS2K3SP1... something that specifies Standards conformance PLUS
>> extended keywords. Currently the only Standards conformance you can
>> turn on and still compile PSDK headers is for loop scope conformance.
As Bronek commented (in the immediately preceding post), the only pragma
is forScope, which is for loop variable scope compliance. There's no
pragma to toggle /Za and /Ze within the code (unlike Borland, which
pretty much allows you to toggle any option via pragma)
- Next message: Antonio: "Re: How to check from destructor whether it was called due to exception or normal exit from the scope?"
- Previous message: George M. Garner Jr.: "Re: how to change unsigned short to hex code??"
- In reply to: Jason Winnebeck: "Re: Microsoft & GNU c++ compiler"
- Next in thread: Andre Kaufmann: "Re: Microsoft & GNU c++ compiler"
- Reply: Andre Kaufmann: "Re: Microsoft & GNU c++ compiler"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|