Re: Microsoft & GNU c++ compiler
From: Jason Winnebeck (gillius_at_mail.rit.nspam.edu)
Date: 07/08/04
- Next message: Bronek Kozicki: "Re: Microsoft & GNU c++ compiler"
- Previous message: Jonathan Turkanis: "Re: How to flush the ostringstream buffer?"
- In reply to: red floyd: "Re: Microsoft & GNU c++ compiler"
- Next in thread: Bronek Kozicki: "Re: Microsoft & GNU c++ compiler"
- Reply: Bronek Kozicki: "Re: Microsoft & GNU c++ compiler"
- Reply: red floyd: "Re: Microsoft & GNU c++ compiler"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Thu, 08 Jul 2004 08:10:00 -0400
Could one not use pragmas to turn on extensions in your "master" (PCH)
header file when you include the SDK stuff, then turn them back on
afterwards?
Jason
red floyd wrote:
> Bronek Kozicki wrote:
> (pity you must use extensions in order to compile Platform
>
>> SDK headers)
>
>
> Yeah that would be a nice thing to add either in VS2K5 or in VS2K3SP1...
> something that specifies Standards conformance PLUS extended keywords.
> Currently the only Standards conformance you can turn on and still
> compile PSDK headers is for loop scope conformance.
- Next message: Bronek Kozicki: "Re: Microsoft & GNU c++ compiler"
- Previous message: Jonathan Turkanis: "Re: How to flush the ostringstream buffer?"
- In reply to: red floyd: "Re: Microsoft & GNU c++ compiler"
- Next in thread: Bronek Kozicki: "Re: Microsoft & GNU c++ compiler"
- Reply: Bronek Kozicki: "Re: Microsoft & GNU c++ compiler"
- Reply: red floyd: "Re: Microsoft & GNU c++ compiler"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|