Re: Static or Shared MFC DLLs?
- From: "AliR [VC++ MVP]" <AliR@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 5 Jun 2009 09:50:22 -0500
Can't you simply put a debug version of your app along with xxx90d.dll on
the client machine?
AliR.
"Tom Serface" <tom@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:%23u5Jgve5JHA.4932@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
I often wish there were a debug version of the redistributable that could
easily be installed on another machine (without having to install Visual
Studio as well) just for debugging purposes. There have been times where I
have an issue "only on this machine" and debugging with WinDebug is not as
much fun. If I could load the debug version with all the correct runtimes
I could at least see ASSERTS and do more interesting debugging.
Tom
"Giovanni Dicanio" <giovanniDOTdicanio@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:egZpkse5JHA.6136@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Paul wrote:
I have mfcm80.dll on my XP machine. The file description says: "MFC
Managed Library - Retail Version" It's only 68KB, while the unicode
version, mfcm80u.dll, is only 57KB. I wonder why it says retail
version.
I think "retail" version is opposed to "debug" version...
i.e. the "debug" versions of the DLL are *not* redistributable and can be
used only during the development/debug process when you run your program
with your IDE.
Giovanni
.
- References:
- Static or Shared MFC DLLs?
- From: Paul
- Re: Static or Shared MFC DLLs?
- From: Ajay
- Re: Static or Shared MFC DLLs?
- From: Paul
- Re: Static or Shared MFC DLLs?
- From: Ajay
- Re: Static or Shared MFC DLLs?
- From: Giovanni Dicanio
- Re: Static or Shared MFC DLLs?
- From: Paul
- Re: Static or Shared MFC DLLs?
- From: Giovanni Dicanio
- Re: Static or Shared MFC DLLs?
- From: Tom Serface
- Static or Shared MFC DLLs?
- Prev by Date: Re: Static or Shared MFC DLLs?
- Next by Date: Re: Static or Shared MFC DLLs?
- Previous by thread: Re: Static or Shared MFC DLLs?
- Next by thread: Re: Static or Shared MFC DLLs?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|