Re: delete does not free memory with CString

Tech-Archive recommends: Repair Windows Errors & Optimize Windows Performance

"Giovanni Dicanio" <giovanniDOTdicanio@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

The better CString implementation is only one of these improvements.
There are others like better STL implementation, or some useful compiler
switches like /GS (that helps against buffer overruns) and much more.
The newer IDEs are somewhat slower than VC6 one (and the lack of ClassWizard
is a negative point if you do MFC development), but there are useful
features in the newer IDEs as well, in particular I like debugger
visualizers a lot (they make the debugging experience much better).

Just to not discourage the OP because of the lack of ClassWizard.
ClassWizard's functionality is still there but it's spread all over
the place and some functions like creating a control variable became
awfully slow.

Hans
.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: delete does not free memory with CString
    ... I do miss the nice interface for COM and ActiveX objects that ClassWizard had. ... The newer IDEs are somewhat slower than VC6 one (and the lack of ClassWizard ... visualizers a lot (they make the debugging experience much better). ... ClassWizard's functionality is still there but it's spread all over ...
    (microsoft.public.vc.mfc)
  • comments on eclipse?
    ... I want to be able to design an interface but point and ... Do the IDEs generally allow this level of design, or more specifically, ... does eclipse provide this level of functionality? ...
    (comp.lang.java)