Re: Future of MFC?

I still think small, fast, native applications are good for commercial apps. ..NET is getting better, but it packs around a lot of overhead. Native is also better, imo, for services, drivers, etc.

Tom

"Ajay Kalra" <ajaykalra@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message news:8B52B3C2-EF93-40C6-BFB0-07DFE1EFEBE5@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

"Tom Serface" <tom.nospam@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message news:OQGIGay%23HHA.700@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
My point was that C++ is the best way to do native.

Thats a no brainer. I am not sure if there is another choice. Question is now, why do you have this requirement (to be native)?

---
Ajay

.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Future of MFC?
    ... but it packs around a lot of overhead. ... "I still think small, fast, *Win32 SDK* applications are good for commercial apps. ...
    (microsoft.public.vc.mfc)
  • Re: Future of MFC?
    ... but it packs around a lot of overhead. ... Native is also better, imo, for services, drivers, etc. ... "I still think small, fast, *Win32 SDK* applications are good for commercial apps. ...
    (microsoft.public.vc.mfc)
  • Re: Future of MFC?
    ... apps. ... but it packs around a lot of overhead. ... "I still think small, fast, *Win32 SDK* applications are good for commercial ...
    (microsoft.public.vc.mfc)
Loading