Re: Future of MFC?

Tech-Archive recommends: Repair Windows Errors & Optimize Windows Performance

"Tom Serface" <tom.nospam@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message news:%23K5ughs%23HHA.4712@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
I don't think it's a secret that VC++ is the BEST way to do native or mixed (managed and unmanaged) applications.

BEST is subjective, but I think I'm going to break that secret. For me it was better to do mixed by using C# for the managed part and VC++ for the native part. MFC and ATL are still going to remain necessary for the same reasons as always.

.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Future of MFC?
    ... I don't think it's a secret that VC++ is the BEST way to do native or mixed applications. ... Since there are languages that are easier to use for totally managed applications it makes sense for VC++ to focus on native. ... It makes sense for MSFT to improve that paradigm. ...
    (microsoft.public.vc.mfc)
  • Re: National security backdoor.
    ... In article, Bill Unruh wrote: ... > Not surprising you have not heard about it. ... > a) So top secret that if you had, ... SSH (nor protocol nor any applications) is not under US ...
    (comp.security.unix)
  • Re: Leopard - Sneak Preview
    ... just wonder what the "top secret" applications are that weren't shown to ... Microsoft today are? ... A special viral shield that will place all Windows boxes on a ...
    (comp.sys.mac.advocacy)
  • Re: challenge-response in 32 bits, tradeoffs
    ... >>I have two applications, sharing a secret. ... >>A2 knows the secret, so they engage in a challenge-response protocol. ... Ie, even if A2 known nothing, there is a chance that A1 ...
    (sci.crypt)