Re: WaitForSingleObject() will not deadlock
- From: Frank Cusack <fcusack@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 01 Jul 2007 23:43:56 -0700
On Mon, 02 Jul 2007 01:44:06 -0400 Joseph M. Newcomer <newcomer@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
But the issue is how can you lock and traverse a potentially
circular list with "node has been visited" detection without a
recursive mutex?
pthread_mutex_trylock()? or equivalent.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: WaitForSingleObject() will not deadlock
- From: Joseph M . Newcomer
- Re: WaitForSingleObject() will not deadlock
- References:
- Re: WaitForSingleObject() will not deadlock
- From: Joseph M . Newcomer
- Re: WaitForSingleObject() will not deadlock
- From: Frank Cusack
- Re: WaitForSingleObject() will not deadlock
- From: Joseph M . Newcomer
- Re: WaitForSingleObject() will not deadlock
- From: Alexander Grigoriev
- Re: WaitForSingleObject() will not deadlock
- From: Doug Harrison [MVP]
- Re: WaitForSingleObject() will not deadlock
- From: Joseph M . Newcomer
- Re: WaitForSingleObject() will not deadlock
- Prev by Date: Re: WaitForSingleObject() will not deadlock
- Next by Date: Re: encrypt data in registry
- Previous by thread: Re: WaitForSingleObject() will not deadlock
- Next by thread: Re: WaitForSingleObject() will not deadlock
- Index(es):