Re: Check a radio button

Comments:

"AliR (VC++ MVP)" <AliR@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:rTE7i.23716$YL5.4248@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
I agree with Joe no this, why would you have a control on a dialog if you
don't have a variable attached to it?

Someone from a parallel group comes to you and asks you to change something
in your dialog, but makes a special request not to add any more variables to
the dialog's header file. What if all they have from you is a header, and
they include it all over? Then two separate components ship, yours with an
extra variable, and theirs without - consequences?

In a "normal" organization things like that are less likely possible. In an
organization like MS, with all their bureacracy, you may want to think 10
times before changing your interfaces.

How would you manipulate the control?

Through (Control*)GetDlgItem( ... )

So that fact that he said that creating a variable for the control is
fundamental, is 100% true. (Unless all your controls are static controls)

Every situation is different.


AliR.

"Ashot Geodakov" <a_geodakov@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:eso0jJ7oHHA.4032@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Are you always like this?

Adding an extra member to a class increases the object's size. I don't
know why it can be a problem, but who knows what kind of code out there
depends on a fixed object's size?




.

Loading