Re: Seeing VERSIONINFO under Vista?
- From: Daniel James <wastebasket@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 27 May 2007 15:18:42 +0100
In article news:<1t7c53d890rnss8mqsftpssgcbcm6nbm07@xxxxxxx>, Joseph M. Newcomer
wrote:
Win16 could not use more than 16MB of memory, since that was the maximum that
those boxes could support.
IIRC 16MB was the maximum a '286 could support. Win16 could use more memory when
run on a '386 (and in '386 mode it had much better memory management).
I was right.
Well, it /was/ a rather easy question.
Cheers,
Daniel.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Seeing VERSIONINFO under Vista?
- From: Joseph M . Newcomer
- Re: Seeing VERSIONINFO under Vista?
- References:
- Re: Seeing VERSIONINFO under Vista?
- From: David Ching
- Re: Seeing VERSIONINFO under Vista?
- From: Tom Serface
- Re: Seeing VERSIONINFO under Vista?
- From: MrAsm
- Re: Seeing VERSIONINFO under Vista?
- From: Daniel James
- Re: Seeing VERSIONINFO under Vista?
- From: MrAsm
- Re: Seeing VERSIONINFO under Vista?
- From: Tom Serface
- Re: Seeing VERSIONINFO under Vista?
- From: Daniel James
- Re: Seeing VERSIONINFO under Vista?
- From: David Ching
- Re: Seeing VERSIONINFO under Vista?
- From: Daniel James
- Re: Seeing VERSIONINFO under Vista?
- From: David Ching
- Re: Seeing VERSIONINFO under Vista?
- From: Joseph M . Newcomer
- Re: Seeing VERSIONINFO under Vista?
- Prev by Date: Re: Seeing VERSIONINFO under Vista?
- Next by Date: Re: Seeing VERSIONINFO under Vista?
- Previous by thread: Re: Seeing VERSIONINFO under Vista?
- Next by thread: Re: Seeing VERSIONINFO under Vista?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
Loading