Re: peer code review/advice needed for noob programmer
- From: MrAsm <mrasm@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 22 May 2007 14:56:38 GMT
On Tue, 22 May 2007 09:12:12 -0400, Joseph M. Newcomer
<newcomer@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
RETVALUE CMyClass::Buffer2HexString( const BYTE* pBuffer, const unsigned int
pBufferSize, char** pString )
I wouldhave written this as
RETVALUE CMyClass::Buffer2HexString(CByteArray & Buffer, CString & String)
In addition to very useful and meaningful Joe's notes, I would like to
adjust the prototype to use the C++ const-correctness (we had some
posts about that recently).
RETVALUE CMyClass::Buffer2HexString(
const CByteArray & Buffer, // <-- input read-only buffer
CString & String
)
In fact, the original prototype used 'const BYTE *', so I get that the
input byte array is a const parameter.
MrAsm
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: peer code review/advice needed for noob programmer
- From: Joseph M . Newcomer
- Re: peer code review/advice needed for noob programmer
- References:
- peer code review/advice needed for noob programmer
- From: Stick
- Re: peer code review/advice needed for noob programmer
- From: Joseph M . Newcomer
- peer code review/advice needed for noob programmer
- Prev by Date: Re: Combo box getting hidden
- Next by Date: Re: Compilator C++ freeware for commercial use
- Previous by thread: Re: peer code review/advice needed for noob programmer
- Next by thread: Re: peer code review/advice needed for noob programmer
- Index(es):