Re: Vector Graphics - was MFC and GDI+
- From: Owen Ransen <willy@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 23 Apr 2007 07:22:10 +0200
On Sun, 22 Apr 2007 16:30:21 -0400, Joseph M. Newcomer
<newcomer@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
The issue of "vector" graphics vs. "pixel" graphics is deep. Unfortunately, it is also
largely a dead issue
Vector Graphics does not always mean simply the hardware,
but also the (inner) representation of the image. For
example Illustrator files. Illustrator is not dead yet.
Easy to use graphics effects:
http://www.ransen.com/
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Vector Graphics - was MFC and GDI+
- From: Joseph M . Newcomer
- Re: Vector Graphics - was MFC and GDI+
- References:
- MFC and GDI+
- From: David Webber
- Re: MFC and GDI+
- From: Michael Phillips, Jr.
- Re: MFC and GDI+
- From: David Webber
- Re: MFC and GDI+
- From: Michael Phillips, Jr.
- Re: MFC and GDI+
- From: Michael Phillips, Jr.
- Re: MFC and GDI+
- From: David Webber
- Re: MFC and GDI+
- From: Michael Phillips, Jr.
- Vector Graphics - was MFC and GDI+
- From: David Webber
- Re: Vector Graphics - was MFC and GDI+
- From: Joseph M . Newcomer
- MFC and GDI+
- Prev by Date: Re: Vector Graphics - was MFC and GDI+
- Next by Date: Re: _DEBUG_NEW VC6 -> VC2005 ?
- Previous by thread: Re: Vector Graphics - was MFC and GDI+
- Next by thread: Re: Vector Graphics - was MFC and GDI+
- Index(es):