Re: which operating systems support MFC71*.dlls ?
- From: "David Ching" <dc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 23 Apr 2007 04:39:28 GMT
"Joseph M. Newcomer" <newcomer@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:om4o23pfs40gsqn62aiacuhmpll89rcauu@xxxxxxxxxx
Most of the problems we've had with people copying the .exe file to
another machine deal
with obsolete DLLs in other areas, such as COM/OLE support. If we built
on XP and they
move to Win2K, there have been problems.
If you mean you set the _WINVER and _WIN32_IE defines to be XP, then yes,
you might very well have problems if you deploy on 2K. But this affects
dynamic linking as well as static linking.
-- David
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: which operating systems support MFC71*.dlls ?
- From: Joseph M . Newcomer
- Re: which operating systems support MFC71*.dlls ?
- References:
- Re: which operating systems support MFC71*.dlls ?
- From: MrAsm
- Re: which operating systems support MFC71*.dlls ?
- From: Joseph M . Newcomer
- Re: which operating systems support MFC71*.dlls ?
- From: David Ching
- Re: which operating systems support MFC71*.dlls ?
- From: Joseph M . Newcomer
- Re: which operating systems support MFC71*.dlls ?
- Prev by Date: Re: File parsing issue with CFile::GetPosition() function
- Next by Date: Re: Vector Graphics - was MFC and GDI+
- Previous by thread: Re: which operating systems support MFC71*.dlls ?
- Next by thread: Re: which operating systems support MFC71*.dlls ?
- Index(es):