Re: Are _T() and TEXT() macros equivalent?
- From: "Mihai N." <nmihai_year_2000@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 06 Apr 2007 23:55:02 -0700
Yes, these are the kinds of idiotic things that give C++ a bad name asThis has absolutely nothing to do with C/C++
being too complex.
_T, TEXT, _TEXT are not part of the standard, are just a bunch of MS macros.
And if one defines both _UNICODE and UNICODE as recomended, then is easy.
--
Mihai Nita [Microsoft MVP, Windows - SDK]
http://www.mihai-nita.net
------------------------------------------
Replace _year_ with _ to get the real email
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Are _T() and TEXT() macros equivalent?
- From: David Ching
- Re: Are _T() and TEXT() macros equivalent?
- References:
- Are _T() and TEXT() macros equivalent?
- From: Martin
- Re: Are _T() and TEXT() macros equivalent?
- From: Mihai N.
- Re: Are _T() and TEXT() macros equivalent?
- From: David Ching
- Re: Are _T() and TEXT() macros equivalent?
- From: MrAsm
- Re: Are _T() and TEXT() macros equivalent?
- From: David Ching
- Are _T() and TEXT() macros equivalent?
- Prev by Date: Re: Are _T() and TEXT() macros equivalent?
- Next by Date: Re: Are _T() and TEXT() macros equivalent?
- Previous by thread: Re: Are _T() and TEXT() macros equivalent?
- Next by thread: Re: Are _T() and TEXT() macros equivalent?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
Loading