Re: Visual C++ Book
- From: "Tom Serface" <tom.nospam@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 1 Apr 2007 07:20:40 -0700
I think what makes C# successful:
1. Microsoft really pushes it as being "more cool".
2. They get all of the VS functionality for .NET
3. Microsoft using the excuse that C++ is "too difficult" to do some of the functionality that C# has so naturally people think C++ is "more difficult"
4. C# gets the "new stuff" a release before C++, at least, which is usually over a year. Thus C# gets momentum.
What makes C++ successful:
1. C# can't do native
2. .NET still not a speed demon so not suitable for all applications
3. Lots of people were already using MFC/C++
Tom
"MrAsm" <mrasm@xxxxxxx> wrote in message news:gg1v03l392vg71ngr8mnvkl8648o7gl3tv@xxxxxxxxxx
On Sun, 01 Apr 2007 04:05:29 GMT, "David Ching"
<dc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
OTOH, I am reading Advanced C# by Trey Nash which tells of best practices,
and there is a TON of stuff to learn regarding IDisposable, threading,
exception handling, etc. before one can claim to be proficient in C#.
I believe that claiming to be proficient in C# and doing *advanced*
stuff in C# is absolutely not trivial, and requires studying and
coding.
C# is not VisualBasic6++ ;-)
MrAsm
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Visual C++ Book
- From: Ajay Kalra
- Re: Visual C++ Book
- From: David Ching
- Re: Visual C++ Book
- References:
- Re: Visual C++ Book
- From: MrAsm
- Re: Visual C++ Book
- From: Ajay Kalra
- Re: Visual C++ Book
- From: Tom Serface
- Re: Visual C++ Book
- From: David Ching
- Re: Visual C++ Book
- From: MrAsm
- Re: Visual C++ Book
- Prev by Date: Re: Visual C++ Book
- Next by Date: Re: Resizing dialog
- Previous by thread: Re: Visual C++ Book
- Next by thread: Re: Visual C++ Book
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|