Re: What instead of new/delete?
- From: "Ajay Kalra" <ajaykalra@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 12 Mar 2007 06:32:01 -0700
On Mar 12, 8:55 am, ujjwaltriv...@xxxxxxxxx wrote:
Can I use any method to allocate /deallocate memory other than new/
delete operators? Actually the problem is while using delete operator
in my ".sqc" files the application crashes. It seems the memory
location is locked by DB and so it throws an 'unhandled exception'.
Following is the code snippet from my application and now i dont wanna
touch the basic design.
Regards,
UvT
Code Snippet:
//----------------------------------------------------------------------------
// SQLFetchfun() - Fetch the next record pointing by the cursor.
//-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
long SQLfunFetch(fun *afun)
{
#if 0
EXEC SQL BEGIN DECLARE SECTION;
char hv_fnName[31];
char hv_fnID[16];
char hv_area[11];
short *hv_fnCrType;
char hv_creatorName[21];
char hv_creatorID[11];
EXEC SQL END DECLARE SECTION;
#else
/* char *hv_fnName; //Comments : Here comment the
earlier code & intialize all the
char *hv_fnID; // pointer variables with "new"
declaration.
char *hv_area;
short *hv_fnCrType;
char *hv_creatorName;
char *hv_creatorID;*/
char *hv_fnName = new char[sizeof(afun->fnName)*sizeof(TCHAR)]; //Comments : use sizeof var name * sizeof
TCHAR
char *hv_fnID = new char[sizeof(afun->fnID)*sizeof(TCHAR)];
char *hv_area = new char[sizeof(afun->area)*sizeof(TCHAR)];
short *hv_fnCrType;
char *hv_creatorName = new char[sizeof(afun->creatorName)*sizeof(TCHAR)];
char *hv_creatorID = new char[sizeof(afun->creatorID)*sizeof(TCHAR)];
#endif
EXEC SQL SET SQLCA "gpSqlca";
/* hv_fnName = cfun->fnName; //Comments : Here comment the
earlier code of intialization & use Convertto_mbcs
hv_fnID = cfun->fnID; //
hv_area = cfun->area;
hv_fnCrType = &cfun->fnCrType;
hv_creatorName = cfun->creatorName;
hv_creatorID = cfun->creatorID;*/
Convertto_mbcs(afun->fnName,hv_fnName);
Convertto_mbcs(afun->fnID,hv_fnID);
Convertto_mbcs(afun->area,hv_area);
Convertto_mbcs(afun->creatorName,hv_creatorName);
Convertto_mbcs(afun->creatorID,hv_creatorID);
hv_fnCrType = &afun->fnCrType;
EXEC SQL FETCH RELATIVE 1 funCursor
INTO :hv_fnName,
:hv_fnID,
:hv_area,
:hv_fnCrType,
:hv_creatorName,
:hv_creatorID; //Comments : After the SQL statement is
finished convert the vaules from
// host variable to widechar & fill the unicode
structure
Convertto_widechar(afun->fnName,hv_fnName);
Convertto_widechar(afun->fnID,hv_fnID);
Convertto_widechar(afun->area,hv_area);
Convertto_widechar(afun->creatorName,hv_creatorName);
Convertto_widechar(afun->creatorID,hv_creatorID);
delete hv_fnName; //Comments : Delete the
variables earlier assigned with "new"
delete hv_fnID;
delete hv_area;
delete hv_creatorID;
delete hv_creatorName;
return ( gpSqlca->sqlcode );
}
You are taking a flawed approach. Not using delete will not solve the
underlying problem. If you cant use delete, figure out why that is so;
perhaps the memory has already been freed. You will need to play by
the rules as outlined by the subsystem.
---
Ajay
.
- References:
- What instead of new/delete?
- From: ujjwaltrivedi
- What instead of new/delete?
- Prev by Date: Re: [Winsock]Multiple OnReceive function exist?
- Next by Date: Re: debug assertion error in threads of c++ under windows
- Previous by thread: What instead of new/delete?
- Next by thread: Re: What instead of new/delete?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
