Re: Semi-newbie question on Visual C++ vs. Visual C#
- From: "Ian Semmel" <anyone@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 12 Feb 2007 04:14:57 +1000
"MrAsm" <mrasm@xxxxxxx> wrote in message news:teius2548cfe6qde07a84i4nkb5731da93@xxxxxxxxxx
On Sun, 11 Feb 2007 08:03:30 +0100, "Bruno van Dooren [MVP VC++]"
<bruno_nos_pam_van_dooren@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Short version: I will be creating stand-alone applications for
Windows. Which environment will make it quicker and easier for me to
create the necessary GUI's -- Visual C++ or Visual C#?
See my blog for an explanation of when I would use either C++ or C#, based
on their strengths and weaknesses.
In your opinion, do you think that would be possible to buil some
"important" software like Office or Visual Studio or Mathematica using
C#? (...and don't require to user wait long time for app start-up or
computations.)
Thanks in advance,
MrAsm
You can write anything in C# and it is not that slow to start up. Look at Paint.NET.
I think they use native code for some critical parts.
.
- References:
- Prev by Date: Re: Semi-newbie question on Visual C++ vs. Visual C#
- Next by Date: Re: CreateFileMapping/MapViewOfFile and 0xC0000005 (ACCESS_DENIED)
- Previous by thread: Re: Semi-newbie question on Visual C++ vs. Visual C#
- Next by thread: Re: Semi-newbie question on Visual C++ vs. Visual C#
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|