Re: Function pointers for DLL functions?
- From: "Peter Olcott" <NoSpam@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 3 Dec 2006 07:12:41 -0600
"David Ching" <dc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:dqsch.18266$9v5.4234@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
"Peter Olcott" <NoSpam@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in messageThat might be a good idea, I will look into it. What about licensing issues? I
news:gjYbh.1273$BD5.84@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
I am not encountering a problem, I am examining the feasibility of making an
extensible interpreted scripting language. I want to provide the capability
of extending the language by adding functions written in C++. Although the
functions would be written in C++ they would be callable from the interpreted
language.
Why don't you embed a Python or Lua interpreter into your C++ app? These
script languages are made to be embedded into your app and you can easily
expose C functions callable by the script. I highly recommend this over
ActiveX because you control the whole thing.
-- David
can't do the whole GNU thing, I spent 30,000 hours on this to make money.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Function pointers for DLL functions?
- From: Jonathan Wood
- Re: Function pointers for DLL functions?
- References:
- Function pointers for DLL functions?
- From: Peter Olcott
- Re: Function pointers for DLL functions?
- From: Ajay Kalra
- Re: Function pointers for DLL functions?
- From: Peter Olcott
- Re: Function pointers for DLL functions?
- From: David Ching
- Function pointers for DLL functions?
- Prev by Date: Re: Linking DLL's across different compilers and languages
- Next by Date: Re: How to throw an exception
- Previous by thread: Re: Function pointers for DLL functions?
- Next by thread: Re: Function pointers for DLL functions?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|