Re: Function pointers for DLL functions?
- From: "David Ching" <dc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 03 Dec 2006 04:31:05 GMT
"Peter Olcott" <NoSpam@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:gjYbh.1273$BD5.84@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
I am not encountering a problem, I am examining the feasibility of making
an extensible interpreted scripting language. I want to provide the
capability of extending the language by adding functions written in C++.
Although the functions would be written in C++ they would be callable from
the interpreted language.
Why don't you embed a Python or Lua interpreter into your C++ app? These
script languages are made to be embedded into your app and you can easily
expose C functions callable by the script. I highly recommend this over
ActiveX because you control the whole thing.
-- David
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Function pointers for DLL functions?
- From: Peter Olcott
- Re: Function pointers for DLL functions?
- From: Peter Olcott
- Re: Function pointers for DLL functions?
- References:
- Function pointers for DLL functions?
- From: Peter Olcott
- Re: Function pointers for DLL functions?
- From: Ajay Kalra
- Re: Function pointers for DLL functions?
- From: Peter Olcott
- Function pointers for DLL functions?
- Prev by Date: Linking DLL's across different compilers and languages
- Next by Date: Re: Registry DisplayName and .exe
- Previous by thread: Re: Function pointers for DLL functions?
- Next by thread: Re: Function pointers for DLL functions?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|