Re: How about the future of VC++/MFC

Tech Tip: Click here to run a free scan for Windows Errors and optimize PC performance



Until a few weeks ago, it was a closed, highly proprietary language which was based on the
paradigm "write once, debug everywhere". It was designed to lock people into a single
vendor who exercised absolute control over every aspect of its development, and allowed no
deviation from Sun's concept of Purity of Essence (the infamous Sun-Microsoft lawsuit.
Apparently if Microsoft came out with a version that had the slightest incompatibility,
this was Evil, but if Sun broke every existing Java application with their next release,
this was Desirable Product Enhancement and was therefore Good. I lived through this
several times before I gave up on it; by the time I was teaching a Java course, the
current version of Java would not compile any examples from the textbooks which were only
a few months old!)

Now it is Open Source, and it will be interesting to see what happens to it. It now has a
very slight chance of becoming a reasonable language. At least if Sun keeps out of its
development (they have consistently been Java's worst enemy)
joe
On Tue, 28 Nov 2006 14:56:07 -0800, "Tom Serface" <tserface@xxxxxxx> wrote:

What's Java?

:o)

Tom

"BobF" <rNfOrSePeAzMe@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:mluhprki1zr5.obelrtqtdqn$.dlg@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
On Tue, 28 Nov 2006 12:44:32 -0800, Tom Serface wrote:

I think the C# group ...

<$.02US>

I think MSFT is trying to save their azz from the OS tools. By creating a
new language, and migrating core functionality to require it (XAML), they
keep us locked in buying their proprietary tools.

Oh, and compete with Java ... :-)

</$.02US>

Joseph M. Newcomer [MVP]
email: newcomer@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Web: http://www.flounder.com
MVP Tips: http://www.flounder.com/mvp_tips.htm
.



Relevant Pages

  • Re: How about the future of VC++/MFC
    ... I think MSFT is trying to save their azz from the OS tools. ... keep us locked in buying their proprietary tools. ... and compete with Java ... ... created a new language that only serves one purpose; ...
    (microsoft.public.vc.mfc)
  • Re: How about the future of VC++/MFC
    ... And Java wasn't proprietary for all those years? ... I think MSFT is trying to save their azz from the OS tools. ... keep us locked in buying their proprietary tools. ... created a new language that only serves one purpose; ...
    (microsoft.public.vc.mfc)
  • Re: Comparing Lisp conditions to Java Exceptions
    ... All the ISO standards in the world will not make the world ... Nothing keeps you from annotating your program with exceptions based on what ... language should adhere to your theory. ... Curiously, although you don't say it, Java has the opposite problem. ...
    (comp.lang.lisp)
  • Re: casts
    ... This is why most shit programmers refuse to learn languages including ... C Sharp and Java. ... compiler in a later edition of Visual Basic, ... language for processing data. ...
    (comp.lang.c)
  • Re: C, really portable?
    ... > Wait, is Java a modern language superior to C, or is it still ... It is a much better OO language than C++, ... It depends what you are doing, Java aims for rigorous portability - the same ... regardless of platform. ...
    (comp.lang.c)