Re: How about the future of VC++/MFC
- From: Joseph M. Newcomer <newcomer@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 28 Nov 2006 23:27:58 -0500
Until a few weeks ago, it was a closed, highly proprietary language which was based on the
paradigm "write once, debug everywhere". It was designed to lock people into a single
vendor who exercised absolute control over every aspect of its development, and allowed no
deviation from Sun's concept of Purity of Essence (the infamous Sun-Microsoft lawsuit.
Apparently if Microsoft came out with a version that had the slightest incompatibility,
this was Evil, but if Sun broke every existing Java application with their next release,
this was Desirable Product Enhancement and was therefore Good. I lived through this
several times before I gave up on it; by the time I was teaching a Java course, the
current version of Java would not compile any examples from the textbooks which were only
a few months old!)
Now it is Open Source, and it will be interesting to see what happens to it. It now has a
very slight chance of becoming a reasonable language. At least if Sun keeps out of its
development (they have consistently been Java's worst enemy)
joe
On Tue, 28 Nov 2006 14:56:07 -0800, "Tom Serface" <tserface@xxxxxxx> wrote:
What's Java?Joseph M. Newcomer [MVP]
:o)
Tom
"BobF" <rNfOrSePeAzMe@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:mluhprki1zr5.obelrtqtdqn$.dlg@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
On Tue, 28 Nov 2006 12:44:32 -0800, Tom Serface wrote:
I think the C# group ...
<$.02US>
I think MSFT is trying to save their azz from the OS tools. By creating a
new language, and migrating core functionality to require it (XAML), they
keep us locked in buying their proprietary tools.
Oh, and compete with Java ... :-)
</$.02US>
email: newcomer@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Web: http://www.flounder.com
MVP Tips: http://www.flounder.com/mvp_tips.htm
.
- References:
- Re: How about the future of VC++/MFC
- From: Tom Serface
- Re: How about the future of VC++/MFC
- From: BobF
- Re: How about the future of VC++/MFC
- From: Tom Serface
- Re: How about the future of VC++/MFC
- Prev by Date: Re: How about the future of VC++/MFC
- Next by Date: Re: How about the future of VC++/MFC
- Previous by thread: Re: How about the future of VC++/MFC
- Next by thread: Re: How about the future of VC++/MFC
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|