Re: The performance of Editplus is much better than notepad,Why?
- From: wei.niu@xxxxxxxxx
- Date: 21 Nov 2006 08:08:39 -0800
MrAsm <inva...@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
However, nowadays, I think that C# and .NET are not the solution to
all problems, e.g. there are lots of computers running Windows 98 or
Windows 2000, having limited memory to run the .NET framework
"monster". Morever, Windows XP seems to me to have a huge market
share, and you can use C++ and MFC or Win32 on this platform.
But in the next two or three years,all of them,98,2000,xp,maybe will
gradually go into history,just like the old DOS.Vista will run on most
PC.
So for Windows desktop app developing,C# is better than C\C++.How fast
OSs and computer languages come and go!
.
- References:
- The performance of Editplus is much better than notepad,Why?
- From: wei . niu
- Re: The performance of Editplus is much better than notepad,Why?
- From: Joseph M . Newcomer
- Re: The performance of Editplus is much better than notepad,Why?
- From: wei . niu
- Re: The performance of Editplus is much better than notepad,Why?
- From: MrAsm
- Re: The performance of Editplus is much better than notepad,Why?
- From: wei . niu
- Re: The performance of Editplus is much better than notepad,Why?
- From: MrAsm
- The performance of Editplus is much better than notepad,Why?
- Prev by Date: How to create a toolbar like Word 2000?
- Next by Date: Re: Length of Variable names
- Previous by thread: Re: The performance of Editplus is much better than notepad,Why?
- Next by thread: Re: The performance of Editplus is much better than notepad,Why?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|