Re: The performance of Editplus is much better than notepad,Why?
- From: "Ajay Kalra" <ajaykalra@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 20 Nov 2006 11:13:09 -0800
I found editplus's performance is much better than notepad.Editplus
uses only
2--2.5M memory whereas notepad uses more than 4M.Why?
I'm writing a small application managing my diary which costs more than
3M
memory when just opening it wihout opening any diary file,like notepad.
Why editplus costs so less memory?And why notepad costs so much?
As notepad is implemented with the richedit control?And editplus
implemented
with other?
Why does all this matter? These are internal details and products
differ by functionality. If you dont like using Notepad, go ahead with
Editplus.
---
Ajay
.
- References:
- The performance of Editplus is much better than notepad,Why?
- From: wei . niu
- The performance of Editplus is much better than notepad,Why?
- Prev by Date: Re: How to provide plugin interface (command design pattern) in VC++ 6
- Next by Date: Re: Vista RTM on MSDN !!
- Previous by thread: Re: The performance of Editplus is much better than notepad,Why?
- Next by thread: Re: The performance of Editplus is much better than notepad,Why?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|