Re: Is there a Unicode equivalent to ASCIIZ Stings?
- From: MrAsm <invalid@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 16 Nov 2006 17:46:51 GMT
On Thu, 16 Nov 2006 11:59:57 -0500, Joseph M. Newcomer
<newcomer@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
But in UTF8 you *must* use CharNext and CharPrev to advance one character at a time.
Yes, I am (and was) aware of this.
In fact, in my opinion, one of the "bad things" of UTF-8 was the
negation of "one character, one position" (the "good thing" was saving
space for characters storage).
On the other side, I thought that in UTF-16 I could assume "one
character-one position", but this thread showed me I was in error (but
so why the UTF-16? Use UTF-8 instead, as previously written).
Mr Asm
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Is there a Unicode equivalent to ASCIIZ Stings?
- From: David Wilkinson
- Re: Is there a Unicode equivalent to ASCIIZ Stings?
- References:
- Is there a Unicode equivalent to ASCIIZ Stings?
- From: Peter Olcott
- Re: Is there a Unicode equivalent to ASCIIZ Stings?
- From: David Wilkinson
- Re: Is there a Unicode equivalent to ASCIIZ Stings?
- From: Mihai N.
- Re: Is there a Unicode equivalent to ASCIIZ Stings?
- From: MrAsm
- Re: Is there a Unicode equivalent to ASCIIZ Stings?
- From: Joseph M . Newcomer
- Re: Is there a Unicode equivalent to ASCIIZ Stings?
- From: MrAsm
- Re: Is there a Unicode equivalent to ASCIIZ Stings?
- From: Joseph M . Newcomer
- Is there a Unicode equivalent to ASCIIZ Stings?
- Prev by Date: Re: Reading XML stream using unmanaged c++
- Next by Date: Re: Is there a Unicode equivalent to ASCIIZ Stings?
- Previous by thread: Re: Is there a Unicode equivalent to ASCIIZ Stings?
- Next by thread: Re: Is there a Unicode equivalent to ASCIIZ Stings?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|