Re: Uses for Screen OCR technology
- From: "David Ching" <dc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 15 Sep 2006 16:13:29 GMT
"Ajay Kalra" <ajaykalra@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:1158333218.223348.135340@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
You assume that its already not exposed. If you are using COM to expose
it, its likely already being done. I have no way of knowing internal
design, but I would strongly guess this is the case as this is how
functionality is usually exposed.
I would say they have all the polictical reasons to do it. MSFT has
said COM is dying a good death and instead they start using it to
develop its killer. If you read RichardG's site you will notice this
has been the trend in general by MSFT. One of the reasons .Net was
being promoted was that COM is too complex and is dead.
Ajay, we both know when a COM component is developed, it is not natural to
start with a a DLL with exported functions and wrap a COM interface around
it. Instead, the DLL itself has a class factory that creates the COM
objects. So if it's not natural for us, why do you think Microsoft would
have done it that way?
..NET exposes COM in a nice way, much like VB exposes COM in a nice way.
It's the nicest bridge possible from the app developer to COM. But it's a
bridge to, not a replacement for, COM.
COM might be dying as a natural result of the migration to managed code, but
to the extent .NET has not caught on as fast as MS had hoped, native C++/COM
are still alive.
-- David
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Uses for Screen OCR technology
- From: Ajay Kalra
- Re: Uses for Screen OCR technology
- References:
- Uses for Screen OCR technology
- From: Peter Olcott
- Re: Uses for Screen OCR technology
- From: Ajay Kalra
- Re: Uses for Screen OCR technology
- From: Tom Serface
- Re: Uses for Screen OCR technology
- From: Peter Olcott
- Re: Uses for Screen OCR technology
- From: Tom Serface
- Re: Uses for Screen OCR technology
- From: Ajay Kalra
- Re: Uses for Screen OCR technology
- From: Pete Delgado
- Re: Uses for Screen OCR technology
- From: Ajay Kalra
- Re: Uses for Screen OCR technology
- From: Pete Delgado
- Re: Uses for Screen OCR technology
- From: Ajay Kalra
- Re: Uses for Screen OCR technology
- From: Pete Delgado
- Re: Uses for Screen OCR technology
- From: Ajay Kalra
- Re: Uses for Screen OCR technology
- From: David Ching
- Re: Uses for Screen OCR technology
- From: Ajay Kalra
- Re: Uses for Screen OCR technology
- From: David Ching
- Re: Uses for Screen OCR technology
- From: Ajay Kalra
- Uses for Screen OCR technology
- Prev by Date: Re: CString and const char *
- Next by Date: Re: Compiler directive.
- Previous by thread: Re: Uses for Screen OCR technology
- Next by thread: Re: Uses for Screen OCR technology
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|