Re: Up to date MFC Book

From: "David Ching" <dc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 29 Aug 2006 16:23:57 GMT

"Tom Serface" <tserface@xxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:eJHPxX4yGHA.3432@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

The debate over this topic seems to be ongoing and very heated. Microsoft
has created lots of opinionated competition even within it's own ranks.

I think the C++ team woke up and decided it didn't want to be in a
maintenance cycle like FoxPro and MFC, so they decided to give themselves
more relevancy in the .NET world. I'm glad they did!

-- David

.

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Up to date MFC Book
  - From: Tom Serface
- Re: Up to date MFC Book
  - From: Ajay Kalra

References:
- Up to date MFC Book
  - From: AB
- Re: Up to date MFC Book
  - From: David Wilkinson
- Re: Up to date MFC Book
  - From: Ajay Kalra
- Re: Up to date MFC Book
  - From: David Ching
- Re: Up to date MFC Book
  - From: Ajay Kalra
- Re: Up to date MFC Book
  - From: David Ching
- Re: Up to date MFC Book
  - From: Tom Serface

Prev by Date: Re: Should Globally Needed Objects be Members in Main Frame, Application, or be Global?
Next by Date: How to get "MyDocuments" path of a system?
Previous by thread: Re: Up to date MFC Book
Next by thread: Re: Up to date MFC Book
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Relevant Pages

Re: Up to date MFC Book
... has created lots of opinionated competition even within it's own ranks. ... I think the C++ team woke up and decided it didn't want to be in a ... I actually have never seen any ads requiring this technology. ...
(microsoft.public.vc.mfc)
Re: Up to date MFC Book
... The debate over this topic seems to be ongoing and very heated. ... Microsoft ... has created lots of opinionated competition even within it's own ranks. ...
(microsoft.public.vc.mfc)