Re: _stprintf
- From: Joseph M. Newcomer <newcomer@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 31 Jul 2006 16:25:21 -0400
Yes, I agree that the character conversion is probably a bad idea; it makes a lot of
assumptions that probably won't hold when the code gets its first accented character. And
let's not hint at the problems of Unicode surrogates...
joe
On Mon, 31 Jul 2006 01:50:58 -0700, "Mihai N." <nmihai_year_2000@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Joseph M. Newcomer [MVP]Homebrewed encryption is *always* a bad idea,I was trying to be mild :-)
but I suspect this is more likely trying toThis is probably also bad idea :-)
do some kind of character conversion.
Doing any kind of "math" on Unicode characters is very
likely to result in a mess.
email: newcomer@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Web: http://www.flounder.com
MVP Tips: http://www.flounder.com/mvp_tips.htm
.
- References:
- Re: _stprintf
- From: Joseph M . Newcomer
- Re: _stprintf
- From: Mihai N.
- Re: _stprintf
- From: Joseph M . Newcomer
- Re: _stprintf
- From: Mihai N.
- Re: _stprintf
- Prev by Date: Re: Pass command line file name parameter
- Next by Date: Re: _stprintf
- Previous by thread: Re: _stprintf
- Next by thread: Re: _stprintf
- Index(es):
Loading