Re: Should I use Winforms ?
- From: Daniel James <wastebasket@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 06 Feb 2006 10:36:51 GMT
In article news:<u1lA6ZlKGHA.3200@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Ajay Kalra wrote:
if you are not mixing and its *new* code, a pure managed language
is superior to C++.
C++/CLI *is* a pure managed language.
Maintaining and developing in C++ is more expensive/costly than say C#.
I disagree. If you are a proficient C++ programmer who doesn't know C# it
is going to be much easier to learn C++/CLI than C# ... and you end up
working in a more powerful language.
OTOH If your goal is to start by taking a bunch of non-programmers and
training them to program then I agree that the learning curve is going to
be less for a small language like C# ... but why would you start there?
Cheers,
Daniel.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Should I use Winforms ?
- From: Tom Serface
- Re: Should I use Winforms ?
- References:
- Should I use Winforms ?
- From: nicolas . hilaire
- Re: Should I use Winforms ?
- From: Ajay Kalra
- Re: Should I use Winforms ?
- From: Daniel James
- Re: Should I use Winforms ?
- From: Ajay Kalra
- Should I use Winforms ?
- Prev by Date: Re: question about "delete"
- Next by Date: Re: MFC library static or shared
- Previous by thread: Re: Should I use Winforms ?
- Next by thread: Re: Should I use Winforms ?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|