Re: Should I use Winforms ?

In article news:<eRtY2WYKGHA.3272@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Ajay Kalra wrote:
If you are using .Net, why not be all managed and use C# instead

Because C++ is a more flexible, more powerful, language; and (at lest in
VS2005) it can do everything C# can (and more).

[I don't mean to suggest that everyone should taget the CLI, but if you
*are* doing so then you can do so more effectively with C++ than C# in
VS2005 (though not in VS2003). Anyone who is not targetting the CLI has to
use C++ (or another vendor's tools) anyway.]

Cheers,
Daniel.



.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Why no one operating system is wrtten in an object language...!!!
    ... a managed language. ... But interpretation would still be slow, which is usually not a desirable characteristic of OSes. ... I know the CLI is just-in-time compiled form Intermediat ... provides a big advantage for platform compilation because one just has ...
    (comp.object)
  • Re: Why not develop new language
    ... > Why there is no group which seriously tring to develop new language ... CLI is an official standard describing a multilingual VM environment ... of this, now being MS specific, VC++ supports heavy optimisations not ...
    (comp.lang.cpp)
  • Re: Is that a joke ?
    ... > I know that Cor and agree with you. ... in my opinion beats whatever CLI using language every to native ... for what the human brain is not capable to ...
    (microsoft.public.dotnet.general)
  • Re: Up to date MFC Book
    ... As he can use that language to write the CLI ... The answer, of course, is that he'll need Java to write code that has to ... If I could also compile it to generate standard Java bytecode ...
    (microsoft.public.vc.mfc)
  • Re: Accessing Symbol Table @ runtime
    ... This project is basically a CLI. ... Now we are planning to have a GUI too ... What language would u suggest? ...
    (comp.programming)