Re: MFC & Guis
- From: BobF <rNfOrSePeAzMe@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 23 Jan 2006 11:08:36 -0600
How naive. Actually, using controls/colors/windows that look similar to
hardware counterparts can make an application more intuitive to users.
Rectangular, grey buttons aren't always the best answer.
On Mon, 23 Jan 2006 09:57:11 -0700, M wrote:
> Right on. Spend your time developing unique capability for your app, rather
> than meaningless eye candy. People will buy/use an application because it
> performs some useful function, NOT because it has a mauve title bar.
>
>
>
>
> "Daniel James" <wastebasket@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
> news:VA.00000d11.02765b56@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> In article news:<jo0Bf.18723$dW3.8663@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Jessica
>> Weiner wrote:
>>> As we know MFC makes ugly guis.
>>
>> Rubbish. MFC makes apps that look like Windows apps -- which is how apps
>> on
>> Windows are supposed to look.
>>
>>> Is there a way to beauitfy mfc applications so that they look more
>>> professional? Maybe skinning tools? Third party gui librarieis?
>>
>> You want to waste development time and money on pointless eye-candy? That
>> may
>> help sell toy applications, but REAL professional apps don't need (or
>> want)
>> it.
>>
>> Skins, themes, and other such clutter just waste resources and should be
>> avoided.
>>
>> Cheers,
>> Daniel.
>>
>>
>>
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: MFC & Guis
- From: Pete Delgado
- Re: MFC & Guis
- References:
- MFC & Guis
- From: Jessica Weiner
- Re: MFC & Guis
- From: Daniel James
- Re: MFC & Guis
- From: M
- MFC & Guis
- Prev by Date: Re: MFC & Guis
- Next by Date: Re: getting machine name
- Previous by thread: Re: MFC & Guis
- Next by thread: Re: MFC & Guis
- Index(es):
Loading