Re: TCHAR string?
- From: "Jonathan Wood" <jwood@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 8 Jan 2006 23:52:37 -0700
Pete,
>> Except of course, that not all versions of Windows support Unicode.
>
> Technically that is indeed true, however even lowely Windows 95 supports a
> subset of the Win32 API in Unicode for things like COM support etc. In
> addition, Microsoft delivered the Microsoft Layer for Unicode on Windows
> 95/98/Me to add to this support.
> http://www.microsoft.com/globaldev/handson/dev/mslu_announce.mspx
Yes, but even the Microsoft Layer for Unicode has limitations. I'm not
saying it isn't useful. But I didn't think it was worth doing such a version
with my latest Unicode application.
> Realistically, all of the modern operating systems from Microsoft,
> including Windows CE, now support Unicode.
I disagree with this statement. Yes, there is some support there. But if you
have a significant application that was built to use Unicode, you'd have an
enormous job on your hand getting it to work on Win95, and it will require
the distribution of extra code in the form of a DLL.
--
Jonathan Wood
SoftCircuits
http://www.softcircuits.com
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: TCHAR string?
- From: Pete Delgado
- Re: TCHAR string?
- References:
- TCHAR string?
- From: kathy
- Re: TCHAR string?
- From: Ajay Kalra
- Re: TCHAR string?
- From: kathy
- Re: TCHAR string?
- From: Jonathan Wood
- Re: TCHAR string?
- From: Norman Diamond
- Re: TCHAR string?
- From: Jonathan Wood
- Re: TCHAR string?
- From: Daniel James
- Re: TCHAR string?
- From: Jonathan Wood
- Re: TCHAR string?
- From: Daniel James
- Re: TCHAR string?
- From: Jonathan Wood
- Re: TCHAR string?
- From: Pete Delgado
- TCHAR string?
- Prev by Date: Re: TCHAR string?
- Next by Date: Re: Web Browser Control on MFC View will crash application when view is destroied after loading XML file
- Previous by thread: Re: TCHAR string?
- Next by thread: Re: TCHAR string?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
Loading