Re: Venting on .NET
- From: "Tom Serface" <tserface@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 3 Jan 2006 09:43:21 -0800
Hi Ajay,
I think what they are saying is it would be nice to be able to have a
totally managed application with doc/view support. Right now most .NET
applications use WinForms which is very clumsy for doing anything "view"
oriented beyond dialog type applications. A totally managed version of MFC
would be helpful in making C++ compelling for these kinds of applications
imo.
Tom
"Ajay Kalra" <ajaykalra@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:1136307865.469877.205560@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >Well, the Doc/View support belongs in the .NET framework, not in C#,
> >similar
>>to how it is in the MFC framework and not in C++.
>
> Why is that? The correct comarison is that MFC is written on top of
> Win32. The application framework (if at all needed) in .Net should be
> written on top of .Net. Since it will be a .Net module, any other
> language will be able to pick it up regardless of what language is used
> to develop it. Regardless, I dont see any reason for a application
> framework to exist in base library. .Net is *like* Win32 for managed
> apps.
>
> ------------
> Ajay Kalra
> ajaykalra@xxxxxxxxx
>
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Venting on .NET
- From: Ajay Kalra
- Re: Venting on .NET
- From: Joseph M . Newcomer
- Re: Venting on .NET
- References:
- Re: Venting on .NET
- From: Joseph M . Newcomer
- Re: Venting on .NET
- From: David Ching
- Re: Venting on .NET
- From: Ajay Kalra
- Re: Venting on .NET
- Prev by Date: Re: Venting on .NET
- Next by Date: Re: windows nt service
- Previous by thread: Re: Venting on .NET
- Next by thread: Re: Venting on .NET
- Index(es):
Loading