Re: Adding second NIC
- From: "Josh McFarlane" <darsant@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 18 Dec 2005 15:32:34 -0800
Joseph M. Newcomer wrote:
> Not sure what you mean by "unneeded overhead". Note that to function as a keyboard, pr to
> be connected to a serial port, the device must be physically connected to the machine, but
> with TCP/IP, you can plug a wireless PCMCIA card into a slot and use it from
> anywhere...really convenient if you need to work in a large building. My client has a
> limitation of about 25ft. to do reliable serial port transmission at 115200bps, but his
> customers have units installed over large "geographic" areas, up to several hundred feet
> from the computer. TCP/IP works really well at distances. Cable length matters. Wireless
> capability matters. Your solution limits the user to some rather stringent cable length
> limitations.
Well, in terms of wired serial vs wired TCP/IP I was more thinking
about the scanner having to deal with the connection states and
protocols for initiating / maintaining socket connections.
I can definately see how a wireless bar-code scanner would be a great
advantage. I hadn't thought of a need for a solution like that. Also
forgot about the maximum length ofr serial tranmission. Thanks for the
information!
Josh
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Adding second NIC
- From: Joseph M . Newcomer
- Re: Adding second NIC
- References:
- Adding second NIC
- From: Rob K
- Re: Adding second NIC
- From: Eric Hill
- Re: Adding second NIC
- From: Rob K
- Re: Adding second NIC
- From: Josh McFarlane
- Re: Adding second NIC
- From: Joseph M . Newcomer
- Re: Adding second NIC
- From: Josh McFarlane
- Re: Adding second NIC
- From: Joseph M . Newcomer
- Adding second NIC
- Prev by Date: Re: getting rid of the standard mfc icon (in taskbar)
- Next by Date: Re: getting rid of the standard mfc icon (in taskbar)
- Previous by thread: Re: Adding second NIC
- Next by thread: Re: Adding second NIC
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|