Re: MFC future?
- From: "David Ching" <dc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 14 Dec 2005 17:38:07 GMT
"Tom Serface" <tserface@xxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:O9tSCEMAGHA.1408@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Cute David. I agree though :o) Unfortunately. I'm hoping C++ becomes a
> better choice for .NET in the future. You did miss one condition
>
> if ( you want to combine managed and unmanaged code)
> Use C++
>
Very true, and I expect C++ is going to become a tour de force in the .NET
community, especially for migrating legacy apps, as you say. To me, the
only advantage of C# is the better tools in Visual Studio (like the
refactoring). But C++ will catch up in time.
Oh, and I wish C++ had something like the @"literal string" in C#. That's
really the only thing in C# that I've found so far that I truly miss on a
daily basis in C++. Whereas I continually miss destructors in C# on a daily
basis, and the lack of default parameters on a weekly basis.
-- David
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: MFC future?
- From: Tom Serface
- Re: MFC future?
- References:
- MFC future?
- From: NewbProgrammer
- Re: MFC future?
- From: Joseph M . Newcomer
- Re: MFC future?
- From: Tom Serface
- Re: MFC future?
- From: David Ching
- Re: MFC future?
- From: Mike Goldweber
- Re: MFC future?
- From: David Ching
- Re: MFC future?
- From: Tom Serface
- MFC future?
- Prev by Date: Re: PostMessage from a DLL
- Next by Date: Using lparam in cheaderctrl
- Previous by thread: Re: MFC future?
- Next by thread: Re: MFC future?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|