Re: MFC future?


"Mike Goldweber" <mikegoldweber@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:uqFbguCAGHA.3804@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> So, what is the best way to produce dialog based apps using a C++
> language? My last job used Borland Builder to produce dialogs, and
> that was great fun. I'm relatively new to building gui's with MFC, but
> after reading some of the comments here, I'm not so sure this is a good
> use of my time? My new company just converted to Visual Studio .Net
> 2003. If this set of tools has a better method of making user
> interfaces, I'm all of devoting my time to learning that.
>

if ( your app can be a .NET app )
{
if ( you must use C++)
Use VC++ 2005 for .NET
else
Use C#
}
else
Use VC++ 2005 for MFC


-- David


.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: doModal
    ... This group is for standard C++ language only, not for MFC or dialogs, ...
    (comp.lang.cpp)
  • Re: Problem with rendering clipboard contents in popup menu
    ... This group is for standard C++ language only, not for MFC or dialogs, ...
    (comp.lang.cpp)
  • Re: C++ vs. C#
    ... The language itself is the culprit. ... libraries (and I would classify the libraries/frameworks as a kind of "tool" ... I really dont think MFC was designed well. ... If they want a newer framework, ...
    (microsoft.public.vc.mfc)
  • Re: How much oop is too much oop?
    ... > Modal dialogs go back to the Mac and before, ... > because modeless is too hard to implement in MFC. ... MFC programs do not get it right. ... IIRC the parent window can still get some messages when a modal ...
    (microsoft.public.vc.language)
  • Re: MFC future?
    ... What's fascinating about the notion of "trustworthy computing" is the failure to actually ... Even if MFC was never improved it is still a great tool for certain ... for RAD programming for internal use C# ... >> programming language. ...
    (microsoft.public.vc.mfc)