Re: why microsoft choose mfc rather than wtl?
- From: Joseph M. Newcomer <newcomer@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 08 Apr 2005 12:04:37 -0400
More importantly: why would you choose one over the other? And most importantly, why
should it matter? What are the advantages of WTL (which I keep hearing about but can't
find any documentation about) over MFC (which has massive amounts of documentation)?
joe
On Fri, 8 Apr 2005 17:33:20 +0800, "Huang Shu Huai" <huangshuhuai@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>Hi all,
>
> every body on the internet said wtl is better than mfc,but microsoft
>abandon wtl,why?
>
>Regards,
>Huang Shu Huai
>
Joseph M. Newcomer [MVP]
email: newcomer@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Web: http://www.flounder.com
MVP Tips: http://www.flounder.com/mvp_tips.htm
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: why microsoft choose mfc rather than wtl?
- From: Daniel James
- Re: why microsoft choose mfc rather than wtl?
- References:
- why microsoft choose mfc rather than wtl?
- From: Huang Shu Huai
- why microsoft choose mfc rather than wtl?
- Prev by Date: Re: CPrintDialog and GetDefaults method
- Next by Date: Re: CSocket, best way to wait for a reply?
- Previous by thread: Re: why microsoft choose mfc rather than wtl?
- Next by thread: Re: why microsoft choose mfc rather than wtl?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|